[ NEWS ]

MILANO
Tel. +39 02 54122153
Fax +39 02 54139049
PARMA
Tel. +39 0521238822
Fax +39 0521/228866
LA SPEZIA
Tel. +39 0187 518833RA
Fax +39 0187 575012

e.mail:
info@avvdefilippi.com

Legal Forms ii

DOWNLOAD APPLICATION FORM FOR PENAL TRIAL

APPLICATION FORM FOR THE VIOLATION OF REASONABLE LENGTH OF A PENAL TRIAL IN ITALY

 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Council of Europe
Strasbourg, France


 

 APPLICATION
 

Submitted as described in Art. 34 of the European Convention of Human Rights FOR THE EXCESSIVE LENGTH OF A PENAL TRIAL IN ITALY

 

I THE PARTIES

THE APPLICANT

 Name

First Name

Sex

Nationality

Occupation

Date and place of birth

Address

Permanent address

Tel N°


Represented and safeguarded during the proxy by Mr..……., with permanent address at Mr. ... cabinet, address:.


THE OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY

Government

 
OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION: Violation of Art.6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights dated 4 November 1950, about “the reasonable time” of a civil trial

 
II. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS:

PROCEDURE IN THE FIRST DEGREE

1.      On ……………….the Attorney General of …………….was carrying out an inquiry on the applicant for fraud on……according to Art. 640 of the Penal Code, for having signed false bills in order to receive the ordered goods.

2.       The applicant was questioned on..….. by the General Attorney of …….., and he denied his responsibilities. Afterwards, on …………….., during the preliminary hearing the applicant was questionned by the preliminary investigation magistrate. At the end of the hearing the preliminary investigation magistrate commited the applicant for trial in front of the Court of Milan, on……..

3.       List in chronological order: date……….

-       checking of the fairness of the hearing and the plaintiff;

-        admissability of evidences;

-        questioning of a witness;

-        postponement for absence of witnesses;

-        questioning of two witnesses;

-        statement of final decisions, final discussion and final decision reading, ……………..final decsion publication at the Chancellery with the N°     /………

With its final decision N° ../…. the Court acquitted Mr. ……………. from the crime of…..


SECOND DEGREE PENAL PROCEDURE

The General Attorney made a petition against the applicant acquittal.

 1. The trial started in front of the Court of …………. on ………, but the hearing was postponed to ………., for irregular notifications. Then it was again postponed to ........ Up to now the applicant is still waiting for the second degree final decision.

2. IN CONCLUSION : The penal trial started on.....at the Court of Milan, and the hearing was postponed on demand of the preliminary investigation magistrate. It has lasted eight years in the first degree and is still pending, so it started ten years ago and has not ended yet.

3.       The case wasn't complicated so its excessive length is not justified. The judge hasn't used all the means he could to end the trial within the reasonable time described in the penal procedure. This failure are due to misfucntioning of organisation and legal divisions. According to Art. 110 of the Italian Constitution the real guilty is the Ministry of Justice.

 
III STATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION.

1.       The applicant denounces a violation of Art. 6. Of the Convention about the reasonable time for a trial. The Italian Governement was condemned many times by the European Court on Human Rights and the Council of Europe for the excessive slowless of its legal section. Even the ratification attempts failed. In fact, many years after the ratification of its penal procedure code with  the Decree N° 447 of the President of the Republic of 22 September 1988, Italy hasn't found a solution to this failure and hasn't updated its legal section.

2.    This diffused slowness of Italy is a clear violation of Art.6. of the Convention even for the "impossibility to submit an application to a Court" to obtain a final decision.
 

IV STATEMENT RELATIVE TO ART.  35 OF THE CONVENTION.

1
.    Being a case of excessive length of a trial discussed in front of national authorities, it's not necessary to wait the end of the trial to submit an application to the European Court of Human Rights, even if the six months from the date of the final decision according to Art.35 of the Convention haven't passed yet. The Court perfectly knows that the applicant hasn’t the power to speed the making of the decision.


V STATEMENT OF THE OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION.

1.    Verification of the violation of Art. 6.1 of the Convention and matrial and moral offences compensation of the Italian Government. The amount of the compensation shall be fixed afterwards and the applicant underlines the excessive length of the trial and as a consequence his irreparable moral and material offences.


VI STATEMENT CONCERNING OTHER INTERNATIONAL PROCEEDINGS.

The applicant hasn’t submitted the complaint to any other procedure.

VII LIST OF DOCUMENTS

   Copy of

1. Report of the applicant examination of…..at the presence of the Attorney General of…


2 Report of the applicant examination …..at the presence of the preliminary investigation magistrate of the Court of…..and postponing sentence;

3. Copy of hearings reports …………….

4. Applicant acquittal of ……….., n°. …../……….Court of ……………………

5.  Copy of hearings reports in front of the Court of Appeal …………………

    The applicant may submit new document different from those asked by the European Court.
 
VIII STATEMENT OF PREFERRED LANGUAGE.

15.  The applicant may ask to use his native language during his defence and in case of a hearing at the European Court of Human Rights, but also to have a free Italian translation of all documents sent by the European Court Secretary, and of all Italian Government defensive documents. English shall be considered always admissible.

 
IX DECLARATION AND SIGNATURE

I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information I have given in the application is correct and that I will respect the confidentiality of the Commission’s proceedings.
Place, date and signature of the applicant, Mr. …

 …………….

X PROXY

The undersigned …….(first name, name and permanent address of the applicant) I hereby appoint Mr.…as my lawyer to represent and safeguard my interests during the proxy at the European Court of Human Rights and  in any case necessary according to the European Convention of Human Rights

Date and signature……………


Original Signature

DOWNLOAD APPLICATION FORM EVICTION

APPLICATION FOR VIOLATION OF PROPERTY RIGHT IN CASE OF EVICTION IN ITALY

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

Council of Europe

Strasbourg - France

APPLICATION

 

Submitted as described in Art.34 of the European Convention of Human Rights. FOR THE EXCESSIVE LENGTH OF CIVIL TRIALS AND VIOLATION OF THE PROPERTY RIGHT IN CASE OF EVICTION IN ITALY.

 

I . THE PARTIES

THE APPLICANT

 Name

First Name

Sex

Nationality

Occupation

Date and place of birth

Address

Permanent address

Tel N°


Represented and safeguarded during the proxy by Mr..……., with permanent address at Mr. ... cabinet, address:.
 

THE OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY

Government

 
OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION: Violation of Art.6.1 of the European Convention of Human Rights dated 4 November 1950, about “the reasonable time” of a civil trial (competence and enforcement judgment) for the freeing of a rented property for living purposes and for "the impossibility to submit an application to a Court" to object the missing intervention of the public forces to the eviction, that is to say a violation of Art.1 of the Additional Protocol of the European Convention of Human Rights of 4 November 1950 about the owner right to have back his rented property.

 


 

II. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

 

Mr. ……….is the owner of the property located at………,   rented to Mr. ………

The landlord claims the tenant should be evicted immediately from his property by act of the Civil Court of .....

The first hearings were on ........on demand of.........the judge, judging admissible the application, fixed on the eviction date on....

 

The tenant hasn’t respected spontaneously the final decision of the judge and the owner asks for the Court Official Intervention to evict the tenant.

 

Today, after many years, the owner, Mr. ...... is still waiting to enter into his property, even if the eviction is effective and he declared the necessity to live in this property with his family.

Following the Law n°  431 of 9 December 1998 the rent procedure for living properties has been ratified.

                         IN CONCLUSION

The civil trial of the Court of started in ………….., is still pending as the final decision hasn’t been actuated yet.

During the procedure time, the owner has been receiving the amount of ....as rent fees

 


The applicant couldn’t rent or sell to others the flat as his property can’t be occupied during all the eviction procedure time.

III. STATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION AND/OR THE PROTOCOLS THERETO END RELEVANT ARGUMENTS

 
I. OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION: Violation of Art.6, paragraph 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights signed on 4 November1950, on the “reasonable length” of a civil trial (competence and enforcement judgment) on the failed eviction of a living property by Public Officers.

II. OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION: Violation of Art.1 of Additional Protocol to the European Convention of Human Rights signed on 4 November 1950, about the owner right to have returned his rented property.

The Legal Section of the European Court of Human Rights declared that:…………………………….

III. STATEMENT RELATIVE TO ART. 35 OF THE CONVENTION.
Being a case of excessive length of a trial discussed in front of national authorities, even for the "impossibility to submit an application to a Court" to object the missing intervention of the public forces to the eviction, it's not necessary to wait the end of the trial to submit an application to the European Court of Human Rights, even if the six months from the date of the final decision according to Art.35 (previously Art. 26) of the Convention haven't passed yet.




The Court perfectly knows that the applicant hasn’t the power to speed the making of the decision.

 


 IV. STATEMENT OF THE OBJECT OF THE APPLICATION FOR “JUST SATISFACTION”

 
The applicant ask for a check of the violation and for the compensation from the Italian Government, as fixed afterwards, for the legal costs during the eviction procedure as well as material and moral damages for the missing freeing of the rented property.


If not ratified during the trial in front of the European Court of Human Rights, the applicant ask to the Italian Government a compensation of Lire……for legal costs for the eviction procedure. This amount is not definitive.

 

The owner damage is due to the impossibility to rent or sell the property on the free market. Those earnings would have given the chance to the owner to have a home of the same quality as the one rented. Therefor the applicant asks for a compensation of Lire 40 millions.

 

 As for the moral damage, it must be taken into consideration the anxiety and incertitude of the owner from the beginning of the procedure till the end. In fact, while he waited for his property, the owner had to live in his parents'house which caused many difficulties as he already has his own family with a wife and three children. For those moral damages the applicant asks for a compensation of  Lire 35 millions.

V. STATEMENT CONCERNING OTHER INTERNATIONAL PROCEEDINGS

The applicant hasn’t submitted the complaint to any other procedure.

VI. LIST OF DOCUMENTS

Copy:

a)     Notice of process,

b)     Photocopies of reports,

c)     Eviction order,

d)     Bailiff admission report of………

e)     Final decision of the Court of …………….. that fixed the eviction date on …………..

With option to submit new documents on the eviction procedure apart from those asked by the European Court.


VII. STATEMENT OF PREFERRED LANGUAGE

The applicant may ask to use his native language during his defence and in case of a hearing at the European Court of Human Rights, but also to have a free Italian translation of all documents sent by the European Court Secretary, and of all Italian Government defensive documents. English (or French) shall be considered always admissible.


VIII. DECLARATION AND SIGNATURE


I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information I have given in the application is correct and that I will respect the confidentiality of the Commission’s proceedings.

 

Mr. ………………

Legal Representative ………………………..

IX. PROXY

The undersigned …….(first name, name and permanent address of the applicant) I hereby appoint Mr.…as my lawyer to represent and safeguard my interests during the proxy at the European Court of Human Rights and  in any case necessary according to the European Convention on Human Rights

Mr.…………..

 ……………..

Original Signature

Legal Representative ……………………..
 
 

[Legal Office] [Seats] [Books, Articles] [European Convention Human Rights] [Applications to Euro Court of H R] [Decisions of Euro Courts] [Applications ex 89/2001]

[NEWS]

[Other Applications] [Decisions of Other Associations] [Law 89/2001 of Fair Trial] [Legal Forms i] [Legal Forms ii] [Other Web Sites] [Newsletter]